OP-ED: Don't compromise public service for the needs and wants of religion

Apr 01, 2021 | 🚀 Fathership AI

I am surprised to see that the Government is considering allowing nurses to wear the tudung at work as announced by Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam last week.

One's religious belief is his or her personal freedom to practice, as is religious dressing. What religion one wants to believe in and what clothes one wants to wear are their own prerogative.

However, personal rights also comes with it certain boundaries that needs to be respected in certain circumstances and in this case, setting.

The exercise of an individual's private rights should not come at the expense of forgoing the requirements of public service.

That is the reality.

Any company or industry, be it a private or public, comes with it their own set of regulations and standards.

For the uniformed public service like healthcare, it is a requirement for frontline workers to be in - well, uniforms.

If one wants to practice their religious belief, it should be done in their private space. That freedom is guaranteed in Singapore. But when it comes to public service, certain compromises have to be made. If compromise is out of the question, then your desire to choose to work in public service have to be reconsidered.

We need to be firm. The exercise of a person's religious or cultural needs should not extend or infringe upon the boundaries of public service.

It is up to one's personal freedom and right to wear whatever he or she wants when not at work - as long as it does not violate public order.

At the workplace, however, the person should respect the governing laws and regulations of their worplace or industry.

For example, when entering a construction site, one is obligated to wear a safety helmet; when entering the biological laboratory, one should change into protective gear; and when entering a maritime place, one should wear a life jacket.

Summarily, work is work, and individualism is individualism, which means the boundary shall be maintained between what you practice in private and what is expected of you at work.


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram

新加坡政府坚持提高消费税(GST),尽管税收负担较低且公共服务质量高,引发国民的欢欣鼓舞。

Mar 05, 2023 | 🚀 Fathership AI

新加坡副总理黄循财于2月24日在国会2023年度预算案辩论闭幕时,为新加坡低税负担和紧缩的财政立场辩护。他强调,新加坡需要在2024年进行第二次商品和服务税(GST)上调,以照顾不断增长的老年人口。

新加坡税负低

相比其他发达的经济体,新加坡的税收占国内生产总值(GDP)比率要低得多,仅为14%。这种低税负奖励辛勤工作的员工和企业,让人民和企业能够保留大部分所得。

增加政府收入的替代方案

反对党提出了替代收入来源,包括财富税、公司税和土地销售收入。然而,黄循财表示,在确保新加坡的健全和稳定的公共财政下,需要对收入、消费和资产征收混合税。财富税在现实中难以实行;公司税则面临竞争;将土地销售收益视为租约期间收入分割不太可能产生更多相比新加坡今时今日已获得的收入。

 社会流动和解决不平等问题的必要性

在周三的开幕演讲中,反对党领袖毕丹星警告说,在没有采取更多措施解决不平等问题的情况下,将出现“两个新加坡”。在他周五的闭幕演讲中,黄循财回应了呼吁采取更多行动以解决不平等问题的呼声。为确保低薪工人的实际工资可持续增长,国人需要为他们的同胞提供的服务支付更多费用来增加工资。

结论

 新加坡副总理黄循财为上调GST辩护,并强调了对收入、消费和资产征收混合税以提供新加坡健全与稳定的公共财政的必要性。他还回应了呼吁采取更多行动解决不平等问题的呼声,以确保社会流动仍然是“健全而有活力”。


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram