'Litigation risks', 'fair & just outcome' among considerations for amending Iswaran's corruption charges: AGC

In a statement on 24 September, the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) outlined the reasons for amending charges in the case of former transport minister S Iswaran. The court heard that AGC was changing Iswaran's two Prevention of Corruption Act charges to charges under section 165 of the Penal Code. Iswaran pleaded guilty to five charges in total, including the two amended charges, two other charges under section 165, and one charge for obstruction of justice. AGC agreed to amend the charges, and Iswaran agreed to plead guilty. Additionally, 30 other charges against Iswaran will be considered for sentencing. AGC cited litigation risks and the need for a fair and just outcome as reasons for the amendment. A decision regarding Ong Beng Seng will be made soon. Iswaran's sentencing has been adjourned to 3 October.

Background

Iswaran's case emerged when the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found information during another investigation. This led to a quiet probe in May 2023, with then-Prime Minister Lee being informed on 29 May 2023. On 5 July 2023, CPIB informed the PM that they had sufficient information to launch a formal investigation, which was approved. Iswaran was arrested by CPIB on 11 July 2023, the same day as billionaire hotelier Ong Beng Seng. Both were released on bail, and Iswaran was placed on a leave of absence without access to official resources or government buildings.

On 18 January 2024, Iswaran was handed 27 charges related to corruption and obstructing justice. He pleaded not guilty, asserting his innocence. On 25 March, he received eight additional charges, bringing the total to 35. The new charges included allegations of receiving gifts such as whisky, golf clubs, and a Brompton bicycle from Lum Kok Seng, who had business dealings connected to Iswaran's official role. Iswaran also pleaded not guilty to these charges.

On 8 May 2024, the High Court approved Iswaran's request for a joint trial for all charges. Over 50 witnesses, including Ong, were listed for the trial. Iswaran's requests for the prosecution to hand over all witness statements were rejected. The trial, initially set for 10 September, was postponed to 24 September following a joint request from Iswaran's legal team and the prosecution.

Litigation risks and public interest

AGC explained that the decision to amend the charges was influenced by the litigation risks involved in proving the original charges beyond a reasonable doubt, given that both primary parties to the transactions had an interest in denying corruption. AGC also considered whether the amendment would lead to a fair and just outcome in line with public interest.

Future implications

AGC has stated that a decision regarding Ong Beng Seng will be made soon. Iswaran's sentencing, now scheduled for 3 October, will take into account the 30 other charges. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly in terms of charge amendments and considerations of public interest.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla sit amet arcu finibus, ultrices sapien a, vestibulum elit. Maecenas sit amet posuere purus. Maecenas neque odio, vestibulum nec turpis non, pulvinar porta dolor. Morbi quis nisl ex. Ut fringilla eget leo in gravida. Nullam nec lacus eu urna placerat aliquet. Nullam ac rhoncus neque. Nullam eros tellus, ultricies sit amet quam eget, ullamcorper malesuada turpis. Etiam a semper odio, iaculis tristique lectus. Etiam feugiat felis ut ex congue, quis scelerisque velit accumsan. Suspendisse potenti. Praesent dictum risus nisl. Morbi ornare, lorem nec posuere pretium, libero lorem faucibus nisi, vitae tempus enim mauris nec felis. Pellentesque mollis ante quis fermentum pretium. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Integer finibus felis eu neque vestibulum, sed gravida ante ornare. Donec non placerat leo. Aenean arcu nisl, finibus quis enim fermentum, pharetra porta metus. Praesent libero tellus, posuere eget sagittis nec, vulputate at lacus. Donec eu ullamcorper justo. Phasellus varius mollis lectus. Duis non iaculis metus, quis tincidunt ligula. Nunc et sem eu nisi sollicitudin pretium non id nisl. Vivamus et lectus placerat, laoreet urna et, aliquet diam. Nam condimentum arcu sit amet arcu blandit cursus. Sed feugiat congue libero ut consequat. Mauris eleifend erat sed hendrerit consectetur. Duis eleifend pellentesque nulla, ut auctor orci aliquam nec. Vestibulum vel lobortis lacus. Duis gravida sagittis quam. Aenean ac ligula id orci aliquam venenatis. Mauris tempus porttitor mauris quis feugiat. Maecenas rhoncus laoreet maximus. Vivamus semper tempus imperdiet. Quisque sodales massa elit, nec ornare lacus varius sed. Sed sit amet sapien dui. Curabitur tincidunt tortor ac malesuada faucibus. Nulla elit turpis, accumsan in purus quis, convallis iaculis arcu. Aliquam dapibus molestie nisl, eu placerat nisi maximus sit amet. Ut lectus lectus, finibus non auctor at, pellentesque nec lorem. Vivamus pellentesque dui a ex imperdiet, eu malesuada mi maximus. Suspendisse potenti. Aliquam aliquam metus lacus, vitae ullamcorper justo pulvinar at. Vivamus sit amet massa sed nunc sagittis blandit. Aenean id mattis leo. Aliquam vel ex sem. Phasellus tempor, lorem sit amet porta lobortis, lorem dolor gravida lacus, non finibus diam lacus vel metus. Proin interdum quis enim ac pulvinar. Quisque vel dolor libero. Sed ac ullamcorper nibh.