The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has removed the dog and frog graffiti etched on Coleman Bridge near Old Hill Street Police Station in Clarke Quay. The graffiti, spotted by a passer-by, was located at the riverside of the Singapore River, a popular spot for individuals to enjoy the view. The passer-by remarked that “the authorities could do something about it.”
Background
A Shin Min Daily News reporter confirmed that the graffiti had been cleared, although traces of it could still be seen upon closer inspection. An employee from a nearby company mentioned that she had never noticed the graffiti despite passing the bridge daily. She added that if the graffiti were indeed present, it could negatively impact tourists’ impressions of Singapore. “Additionally, as this bridge has historical significance, vandalising this bridge is the same as vandalising a cultural relic,” she said.
Historical significance of the bridge
Originally built in 1840, the first Coleman Bridge was designed by George D. Coleman, the first government superintendent of public works in Singapore. The bridge began as a brick structure with nine arches and was replaced by a timber bridge in 1865. To accommodate increased traffic, a third bridge with three lanes was constructed in 1886. The latest and largest version of Coleman Bridge was completed in 1990, retaining various architectural and decorative features from the 1886 iron bridge, such as ornate columns, lamp posts, railings, and arched supports.
Community reactions
The removal of the graffiti has sparked various reactions within the community. Some residents and workers in the area expressed relief that the graffiti was removed, citing the bridge’s historical and cultural importance. “It’s good that the authorities acted quickly. This bridge is part of our heritage,” said a local shop owner. However, others felt that the graffiti added a unique, albeit controversial, touch to the urban landscape.
Future implications
The incident has raised questions about the preservation of historical sites in Singapore. Authorities may need to implement stricter measures to protect such landmarks from vandalism. Additionally, this event highlights the importance of community vigilance in maintaining the city’s cultural heritage. Future developments may include increased surveillance and community awareness programmes to prevent similar incidents.
