Parliamentary debate on the use of reserves – The Opposition says: “Spend more!” But at what cost for Singapore?

Feb 08, 2024 | 🚀 Fathership AI

Another day in Parliament, another rousing speech from the PSP’s Leong Mun Wai. This time round, he filed a motion on the use of the reserves. His position? Essentially, that Singapore has too much money in our reserves, and hence we should spend more right now to uplift the lives of the current generation of Singaporeans. It would also warm the cockles of some hearts to see the WP MPs supporting the PSP in a rare display of opposition solidarity.

The problem? This is the same old argument that has been made ad nauseum by opposition leaders – such as the late JBJ – decades ago. The PSP and the WP are merely repeating what past opposition leaders have said. Spend, they have said repeatedly. There is no need for our reserves to accumulate at its current pace, they have argued. They were wrong in 1980. They were wrong in 2000. And they are still wrong today.

It was Lee Kuan Yew and the PAP Government who have been consistently right on the reserves. Lee Kuan Yew warned Singaporeans – be careful of “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” politicians who will “fritter away” our reserves; that is why he put in place safeguards – such as an elected president that will have the power and authority to safeguard the reserves. Thank goodness for his foresight. What Singapore has achieved with our reserves is an amazing feat that few countries in the world can replicate. The ability to embark on large-scale public projects without funding issues. The ability to draw down on our reserves during times of hardship – such as the 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19 – without incurring external debt. We would not be able to arrive at such a healthy situation with our reserves if previous administrations had followed the opposition’s mantra of increased spending. Also note that both the WP and the PSP are urging the government to spend more of the reserves in a period of great geopolitical uncertainty - an escalating conflict in the Middle East, an ongoing war in Ukraine, rising US-China tensions, a very possible Trump presidency and a faltering Chinese economy. It is precisely because we are unsure of what lies ahead that we need to even more prudent with our spending, so that we will have adequate resources to tide through difficult times.

Both the PSP and the WP made some false arguments during the debate. For instance, they said that our reserves are bound to continue growing, even if we draw down more. So don’t worry. But consider this - if our reserves are growing relentlessly every year, then the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) should also grow by leaps and bounds every year. However, the NIRC has remained stable at around 3.5% of GDP and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. This means the reserves are growing as fast as the GDP, and not more.

Also note that the 50-50 spending rule for the NIRC first came about during the 1990s from our late former President Ong Teng Cheong, who suggested that we split it half – 50-50. Half for now, and half for the future. A prudent approach. The Opposition suggested: Why not spend more and increase the percentage when our investment returns are high? The problem is – no one has a crystal ball to predict what the future holds. What about periods when there is a prolonged economic downturn? Do we spend less then? Surely Leong Mun Wai and Jamus Lim know that it is difficult to time the market, and hence going with a reasonable average estimate of spending 50% would be the wise thing to do? Investment 101.

The PSP says that there is no need to save so much, since our fertility rate is low. I think Mr Leong Mun Wai should remember that even if we have fewer babies, our adults are also living longer. PSP’s stance is that there is no need to provide savings for Today’s Young who will become Tomorrow’s Old. But we should remember that in 50 years’ time, when Mr Leong is no longer around to suffer the consequences of what he preaches, the 20-year-old Singaporean today will be 70. Drawing more NIRC now – as suggested by the WP – would mean leaving less for younger Singaporeans, who are likely to end up paying more taxes to fund their needs. And the young Singaporeans of today will pay the price if we adopt the PSP’s and the WP’s positions. If we can accumulate a large reserve in 50 years, we can easily spend it in an even shorter period.

At the end of the day, Singaporeans will have to ask themselves – would we have been better off today if we have not been consistently preparing for the worse possible situation? And remember – there is no one to bail us out when things go south. When Iceland, Portugal and Greece ran into severe economy problems, they had the EU to bail them out financially. When the US needs more money, they simply need to increase their debt ceiling given that the US dollar’s status as the world currency. We must rely on ourselves completely.

Both the PSP and WP are not stupid. Surely, they can see the merits of the government’s argument when it comes to the handling of our reserves. But why are they still advancing the positions that they have been making? Hopefully, more Singaporeans will see through their agenda – that advancing populist rhetoric for short term electoral gain is bad politics, and Singaporeans – present and future – will be ones who will pay the price.

➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram

警员死亡案: 种族歧视字眼并非针对他,除一 名上司 "不专业",其他说法皆不实

Feb 07, 2024 | 🚀 Fathership AI

新加坡警察部队(SPF)已向内政部(MHA)提交了有关警官尤瓦拉贾(Uvaraja S/O Gopal)自杀事件的所有调查结果。

2024 年 2 月 6 日,内政部长尚穆根在国会公布了调查结果,他在部长声明中说,尤瓦拉贾对新加坡警察部队的一些指控属实。





2023 年 7 月 21 日,尤瓦拉贾被发现在义顺组屋楼下一动不动,没有生命迹象。


尤瓦拉贾在帖子中描述了他在工作场所受到欺凌和排挤的情况,声称他遭受种族歧视,并经历了 "恶毒的工作文化"。


尚穆根说,警方记录显示,尤瓦拉贾确实在 2015 年提出过投诉,当时也进行了内部调查。



他指出,这些言论是否针对 尤瓦拉贾并不重要,重要的是 "这些言论过去和现在都是不可接受的"。


尤瓦拉贾的上司向团队明确表示,不能使用这种语言,即使是开玩笑也不行,说这种话的警员立即向 尤瓦拉贾道了歉。


尤瓦拉贾的上司提出可以对这名警员提出正式投诉,但 尤瓦拉贾 拒绝进一步投诉。



尤瓦拉贾声称他的上级在 2019 年撕毁了他的请假单,并将这一行为的视频上传到了团队的群聊中。



调查显示,尤瓦拉贾的上司告诉他,他 "给整个团队带来了不便",但尤瓦拉贾没有撤回休假申请,并在私人聊天中要求上司结束谈话。

这位上司随后录下了自己撕碎 尤瓦拉贾请假单的视频,并将他这样做的视频上传到了团队聊天室。







尤瓦拉贾还声称,2021 年,他揭发了被他抓到吸电子烟的警官,但案件被 "掩盖 "了。




在 2023 年 1 月的另一起事件中,尤瓦拉贾举报他的一些同事在警署吸烟。




尤瓦拉贾声称,他从未得到过上级的良好评价,而且由于 "人力问题",上级不允许他调离岗位。



在 9 年时间里,尤瓦拉贾被调往 6 个不同的工作单位,尚穆根说,这是相当多的职位调动。


调查还发现,他的工作能力获得公平的评估。他还被授予 Covid-19贡献奖章。

同事 "抵制 "他的婚礼并非事实

据尚穆根称,尤瓦拉贾声称同事们 "抵制 "他的婚礼的说法也不属实。






他还因在 2023 年 7 月一次不服从命令,而受到内部纪律调查。他当时拿了病假却离开家里。


2023 年 4 月,尤瓦拉贾又一次接受内部纪律调查,原因是他不服从命令,未完成工作且擅离职守。当被要求返回完成任务时,他也拒绝服从。

每年休病假超过 50 天

尚穆根指出,2016 年、2017 年、2021 年、2022 年和 2023 年,乌瓦拉贾分别休了 70 天、56 天、59 天、80 天和 60 天的病假。

2015 年、2016 年和 2022 年,他还休了 100 多天的无薪假。

尚穆根表示,警察部队为满足 尤瓦拉贾的需求,包括他的休假和医疗需求,付出不少努力。








不过,对于 尤瓦拉贾的案件,他说调查结果与 尤瓦拉贾在帖子中的指控 "截然不同"。


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram