Has the PAP government become 'decadent'? Yes, according to NUS Assoc Prof

Sep 21, 2020 | 🚀 Fathership AI

"The PAP (People's Action Party) government has become decadent...and the old theory of Singapore's survival and success seems to have run its course," said Associate Professor Kenneth Paul Tan from the National University of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP).

Prof Tan was speaking in live Facebook webinar last week (Sept 11) titled, “Singapore’s GE2020: The real watershed election?” organised by the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre and co-hosted by the Malaysia and Singapore Society of Australia (MASSA).

The hour-long webinar focused mainly on Singapore's economic and political direction in the face of unprecendented economic challenges.

The PAP is "incapable of reforming itself today"

Prof Tan - who will leaving LKYSPP for a tenured professorship with the Hongkong Baptist University in January 2021 - said that the results of the past general election have shown that the party "is in many respects incapable of reforming itself today".

“Being incumbent for as long as it has, the original paternalist or authoritarianism of the post-colonial founding leaders, which was forged in heroic times has become entrenched today in a much less heroic, less transformative and certainly less inspiring technocracy,” he added.

“The PAP government has become decadent,” he concluded.

Decadence - a term used promiscuously but rarely precisely

Prof Tan conclusion was drawn from a particular grand narrative of Singapore's history which he sought to use to explain contemporary events.

In defining his usage of the word "decadent", Prof Tan explained that the PAP government "has reached the zenith of its achievements".

In his context, he suggested that the PAP government can no longer expand beyond its fixation on the old methods of governance as molded by the founding fathers.

He said, "...the PAP government seems instead to be self-referentially tethered to its own history and the success formulas that history narrates ad nauseam."

Where Prof Tan failed to recognise is the unprecedented threats that comes with economic and technological progress - threats which no leaders from the time of Lee Kuan Yew have had to to contend with.

He also failed to point out the marked progress made by Singapore in the past decade as a result of robust measures undertaken by new generations of PAP leaders to adapt to the evolving geopolitical landscape.

The government's financial prudence and steady monetary policies over the years have resulted in the country being able to respond efficiently and proactively to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

The quality of life for Singaporeans have also improved and on any matrix, Singapore on the whole has progressed well in the past years.

Yes, there are still some faults in the system. It's not perfect. But the question to ask is not who's fault is it, but what are we going to do about it as a society.

Civilisational decadence sets in when societies or governments no longer run on the courage of its convictions. Instead, it is marked by defensiveness, frivolity, and a disinclination for abstract thinking - attributes that Prof Tan alluded to the PAP.

But a truly decadent government is when its leaders become prideful and fail to adequately address the next challenge they face; when its supporting systems and vision erodes for lack of action, and when the government jails its critics for daring to question its legitimacy.

The difference is the ability for a government to recognise such problems and to actively respond to the challenges posed by its physical, social, and political environment.

And also to ensure that academics like Prof Tan continues having his voice heard.


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram

新加坡政府坚持提高消费税(GST),尽管税收负担较低且公共服务质量高,引发国民的欢欣鼓舞。

Mar 05, 2023 | 🚀 Fathership AI

新加坡副总理黄循财于2月24日在国会2023年度预算案辩论闭幕时,为新加坡低税负担和紧缩的财政立场辩护。他强调,新加坡需要在2024年进行第二次商品和服务税(GST)上调,以照顾不断增长的老年人口。

新加坡税负低

相比其他发达的经济体,新加坡的税收占国内生产总值(GDP)比率要低得多,仅为14%。这种低税负奖励辛勤工作的员工和企业,让人民和企业能够保留大部分所得。

增加政府收入的替代方案

反对党提出了替代收入来源,包括财富税、公司税和土地销售收入。然而,黄循财表示,在确保新加坡的健全和稳定的公共财政下,需要对收入、消费和资产征收混合税。财富税在现实中难以实行;公司税则面临竞争;将土地销售收益视为租约期间收入分割不太可能产生更多相比新加坡今时今日已获得的收入。

 社会流动和解决不平等问题的必要性

在周三的开幕演讲中,反对党领袖毕丹星警告说,在没有采取更多措施解决不平等问题的情况下,将出现“两个新加坡”。在他周五的闭幕演讲中,黄循财回应了呼吁采取更多行动以解决不平等问题的呼声。为确保低薪工人的实际工资可持续增长,国人需要为他们的同胞提供的服务支付更多费用来增加工资。

结论

 新加坡副总理黄循财为上调GST辩护,并强调了对收入、消费和资产征收混合税以提供新加坡健全与稳定的公共财政的必要性。他还回应了呼吁采取更多行动解决不平等问题的呼声,以确保社会流动仍然是“健全而有活力”。


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram