Cotton On part-timer falsely accused supervisor of sexual assault, gets away scot-free

Apr 27, 2021 | 🚀 Fathership AI

A male supervisor accused of sexually assaulting his female colleague at a Cotton On outlet during their closing shift at the clothing retail store was cleared of all charges on Monday (26 April), after a judge found inconsistencies in the alleged victim's evidence.

Muhammad Muttakin Talib, 37, was found to have committed the sexual acts with his 19-year-old colleague, found District Judge Jasvender Kaur. However, the prosecution failed to prove that the victim did not consent as there were many aspects of her evidence that were "troubling", and which cast "serious doubt" on her credibility.

"I find that her evidence is a far cry from the threshold of unusually convincing," DJ Kaur said of the woman.

DJ Kaur acquitted Muttakin of all three charges, one of which is for sexually assault by penetration, and two of which are for molest.

He was accused of digitally penetrating the woman, taking her hand and placing it on his penis, and for molesting her breast on 22 February 2017, at about 10.30pm inside the outlet.

Muttakin claimed trial to the offences. He did not dispute touching the woman's bare breast, but maintained that she consented to it. He denied committing the other two offences.

Lawyer Rajwin Singh Sandhu, who handled Muttakin's case pro-bono, pointed out that the victim, then a part-timer at the store, had mentioned it was possibly her last week working at the store and that she was seeking to get a permanent position there.

He suggested that she may have complained against his client so that if he lost his job, more openings would be available.

In explaining her decision to acquit Muttakin, DJ Kaur noted that the woman's account to the gynaecologist who examined her in June 2017 was "starkly at odds" with her testimony in court.

While the woman told the doctor that she actively resisted Muttakin's advances, she testified in court that she had frozen in reaction to the advances.

"From my observation of the complainant, she is no shrinking violet. I do not believe that she was unable to react. On her evidence, she did not allow the accused to kiss her. She said that she turned her face when the accused put his face near her."

When Muttakin had asked her to turn around, the woman told him "no", showing that she was able to draw the line and assert herself, the judge said. It was unlikely that she would have "silently and meekly" allowed Muttakin to molest her.

While the woman had told the doctor that Muttakin had torn her dress, she claimed in court that she told the doctor Muttakin had only pulled down her dress. She then told an investigation officer that she could not find the dress, but claimed in court that the dress was at home.

The woman had also refused a genitalia examination, but denied the refusal in court.

While testifying for the prosecution, the woman also claimed to have heard Muttakin unzip his pants, but under cross-examination, she claimed not to remember hearing a zipper.

Muttakin's argument was that he was wearing jeans with a buttoned flyer on the day of the offence. His jeans were not seized by the police and CCTV footage could not determine that he was wearing the same pair of jeans. However, there was insufficient evidence to prove that the Muttakin was wearing a pair of jeans with a zipper, DJ Kaur ruled.

Noting that victims of sexual assault reacted differently, DJ Kaur nevertheless found the woman's testimony that she did not know whether the sexual assault was hard to accept.

The woman said that she had waited for Muttakin even after she was sexually assaulted, and CCTV footage showed that she was still cheerful and conversing with Muttakin. She was also seen returning his hand swipe and fist bump and then waving.

The judge concluded, "Accordingly I find that the prosecution has not met the standard of proving the mens rea beyond a reasonable doubt on all three charges, and the accused is accordingly acquitted and discharged."


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram

新加坡7人“换妻”迷奸案细节公布!妻子被下药,全程录像直播...

Nov 03, 2022 | 🚀 Fathership AI

几名新加坡男子,在网上论坛认识后,沉浸在性幻想中无法自拔。

为了满足他们心中变态的好奇心,他们开始筹划换妻,并下药迷倒自己的妻子,让其他男子强奸自己的妻子!

昨天(10月31日),这起轰动新加坡一时的罪案在新加坡法庭进行了审理,涉案的七人中,有四人认罪,其中一人当场被判刑。

因为情况太过恶劣,为了保护受害人法院并未透漏她们的任何资料。被告人的名字也全部用字母代替。

回顾这起案件,这些男子的行径着实震碎了正常人的三观……

新加坡这名男子迷倒妻子 邀请其他人强奸并直播录像!

新加坡本体媒体《8视界新闻网》报道,法庭文件透露这起案件的主犯,是一名化名为J的新加坡男子。

J今年52岁,有着一份正当的工作,犯案时是一名业务拓展经理。这些年他和妻子一共生下了三个孩子,一家人原本很和谐地生活在一起。

不过在平静的生活下,J内心里涌动着一些邪恶的想法。

终于,在2010年,他在一个网络论坛上遇到了很多和自己臭味相投的人。在这个虚拟的平台,J肆无忌惮表露出自己的变态性癖,并发表了想玩换妻游戏的言论。

在这里,他们一起分享了很多有关“换妻”的想法。

聊着聊着,有一天他再也忍不住自己内心的想法,问自己妻子是否愿意接受3p。不出所料的,J的妻子拒绝了这个“提议”。

不过,这并没有阻止J付诸行动。

在一开始,包括J在内的一些人纷纷在家中安装网络摄像头。之后,他们会挑选时间告知网友相关的账号和密码,让他们自行观看自己和妻子的性爱视频。

经过一段时间后,J还是不满足。

于是,在某一天他下药迷晕了自己的妻子,然后邀请其他网友来家中与其发生关系!

随着事态的发展,J越来越沉迷其中……2013年,趁着妻子身体不适的时候,J还偷偷换了药物,再次邀请朋友来家中迷奸妻子。

这次,J竟然还打开了网络直播!

沉迷于“换妻游戏”,J不仅仅是让别人和自己妻子发生关系,同时他也跟其中一名网友K“商量好了”,趁着K迷晕自己妻子的工夫和她发生了性关系。

在某种程度上,K的行为更加恶劣,他甚至自己充当了摄像师的角色,拍下了J和自己妻子发生关系时的整段性爱视频……

渐渐的,J的妻子在不知情的情况下跟多人发生了性行为,相关视频还被上传到网络。

在当时,引起了相当多人的关注。

换妻行为曝光报警 更多人牵涉其中受重罚

J本以为这件事可以一直继续下去,不料在今年,他的妻子无意中看见丈夫手机在播放视频。

在好奇心的驱使下,她看到视频内容,这才恍然发现:

在过去的几年里,丈夫在暗地里进行了多次换妻活动,而自己在不知情的状态下被多次迷晕,在和他人强行强行发生关系后还被拍照记录……

拿着证据,J的妻子当面质问K,而K也承认自己曾经和昏迷的她有过性行为,并将自己妻子迷晕交给J的事实。

在得知真相后,J的妻子立即选择报警。随着案件的调查,调查人员惊讶地发现,还有更多人参与其中。

其中,有一名参加了J“举办的”换妻活动的L,也对自己的妻子如法炮制。

在一次在作案时,L的妻子尽管被下药后蒙住眼睛,在中途清醒了过来。

但L居然并未因此感到害怕而终止犯罪活动,而是要求自己一名同事P直接强行跟自己妻子发生关系,幸而L的妻子及时挣脱逃离,才免遭摧残。

之后,P在一封信中交代了全部经过,并表示自己不知道受害人并不知情才犯下罪案。

但法律并不会因为他的解释而对他开恩,最总P被判处三年监禁。他是涉案七名男子中,第一个被判刑的男子。

还有四人也已认罪,等待下一轮审讯。相信在严明的法律下,他们肯定无法逃脱坐牢。

不过,涉案情节严重的K在落网后,一再向警方和法官说自己有心理疾病,并要求医生为其检测,意图逃脱刑罚。

新加坡心理卫生院诊断后,确认了K患有偷窥症。但在审理中法官认为K对自己的非法行为是知情的,依旧是犯罪行为。

K对法院的说法表示不服,并要求开庭申辩。

但K的犯罪事实已被揭露,并且为自己的行为供认不讳,加上此案件牵连甚广,性质过于恶劣,估计也是难逃法律制裁。


➡️ Follow Fathership on Telegram