Digest
Featured
Latest
Tags

Cherian George questions SPH's editorial independence but silent on wife lifting a leg up for Chinese propaganda

May 09, 2021 | 🚀 Fathership

In an opinion piece published on Friday (May 7) in South China Morning Post, media professor Cherian George questioned if the restructure of Singapore Press Holdings into a not-for-profit entity would truly be a step away from the clamps of State involvement.

The Hong Kong Baptist University Journalism Professor said: "(The restructure) is a rearguard action to preserve the ruling party's dominance over mainstream media".

Recounting how former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew enacted the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act (NPPA) in the 70s to indirectly eliminate headstrong publishers not aligned with government interests, Cherian suggested that the overhaul of SPH is not a break away from Government influence, but a continuity of it.

Op-ed published in South China Morning Post - a news outlet known to be devoid of editorial independence

The irony of Cherian's article comes on the back of its publication in South China Morning Post (SCMP), a news outlet known to be influenced by China's political leadership - the same outlet where his wife Zuraidah Ibrahim works as a Deputy Executive Editor.

Cherian's colleague Rose Lüqiu Luwei, also a professor of journalism at the same university said: "I think the top management is already indirectly controlled (by the Chinese Government)" when asked to assess SCMP's level of editorial independence.

The paper has steadfastly rebutted allegations that its coverage isn’t impartial.

“SCMP remains committed to serving our global readers with independent journalism and in-depth analysis, as we have for over 117 years. Our newsroom does not shy away from tough stories, as our entire body of work shows, and we stand by our balanced and objective journalism,” said an SCMP spokesperson.

But current and former SCMP journalists that Quartz spoke to say that it is at the edges where censorship comes into play, like editors such as Cherian's wife Zuraidah quietly nudging reporters away from sensitive topics, tweaking phrases and headlines, or playing down stories related to China’s top leaders.

“I do feel like I am not encouraged to do investigative pieces...and sometimes editors quibble over wording and angles of pieces that are on a gray line,” said a SCMP reporter who spoke under condition of anonymity.

“You can’t tell if it’s censorship, and it’s not egregious enough to keep protesting about, but you’re not entirely proud of the end product.”

The art of subtle propaganda

When it comes to China, the SCMP’s overall coverage remains far from Communist Party mouthpieces such as China Daily or Global Times.

However, nine current and former SCMP employees told a reporter from The Atlantic that the lines of editorial independence were often far less clear.

Nearly all pointed to Yonden Lhatoo, the SCMP’s chief news editor.

Members of the newsroom were particularly unhappy with a story Lhatoo wrote last October pushing a theory popular among pro-Beijing figures that there was a “silent majority” in Hong Kong that was against the Hong Kong protests but had been scared into silence.

They were concerned enough to request a meeting with senior editors after the story’s publication to discuss their concerns over Lhatoo and editing more broadly.

Chow Chung Yan, the executive editor, and Zuraidah Ibrahim met with disgruntled staff, but “there was no attempt to try and reconcile anybody,” one person present at the meeting told the Atlantic. “It was just, ‘This is the situation; if you don’t like it, there is the door.’”

Maya Wang, a senior China researcher at Human Rights Watch tweeted: "...SCMP's problematic but subtle editorial decisions are precisely the point - it makes the unsuspected think they are reading real news when they are actually primed to absorb Beijing's views."

Cherian George makes a fair point in throwing shade at SPH's editorial independence but in the same context, he also needs to look no further than across his marital bed at night to find out if he has been cowering under a shade of hypocrisy all along.

Malay PAP and WP MPs silent on PA saga with some refusing to comment

Jun 16, 2021 | 🚀 Fathership

Political leaders in positions of power have the privilege and the platform to chime in on matters concerning the community with the hope of reining in the outrage before it escalates into something worse.

Unfortunately, all the current Malay MPs from both the People’s Action Party and Workers’ Party either did not wish to comment on the PA saga or did not respond, according to TODAY.

Various Malay community leaders and former MPs gave their views on the matter when approached

Mr Zainal Sapari, former MP for Pasir Ris–Punggol Group Representation Constituency (GRC), said that he would not frame the recent incident as a case of racism.

“I believe PA is true in its cause of promoting racial harmony and social cohesion,” the former PA grassroots adviser said.

“Despite their best efforts, such incidents do happen and will happen again in future, but I would not frame it as racism.”

He also hopes that this incident “does not dampen the spirit of many volunteers who want to serve the community, but may make some bad judgement calls unintentionally”.

“We should just apologise, learn from it and move on,” he added.

Mr Zainul Abidin Rasheed, former Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, said that the reactions to the incident should be one of understanding rather than taking on an accusatory tone.

“We need to continue to learn from each other — how do we appreciate each other’s cultures and differences and bring about better understanding and harmony — rather than to start pointing fingers,” the former Aljunied GRC MP said.

Mr Mohamed Imran Mohamed Taib, an interfaith activist and founding board member of the Centre for Interfaith Understanding, said that racism cannot just be confined to an act of an individual or a particular incident.

He said in a Facebook post on Tuesday — which he confirmed with TODAY was a response to the PA incident — that racism is a “structure, and a system of thinking and doing, that can manifest in an individual, group or social organisation through a style of thinking, speech and communication, law and policy, and physical action”.

“One has to go to the root source and identify what makes the individual think, say and act in a particular way,” he said in the post.

“Doing so would bring us to a point where we say it is not his, her, their or my problem, but it is our problem; that there is something wrong in the way we organise society.”

When asked to elaborate on his post, Mr Imran told TODAY that given the sensitivity of the issues concerning racism, we “must learn not to rush into saying that something is racist or not”.

He said that racism is experienced at the “everyday level” and one should be careful not to dismiss and invalidate the experiences of racism, especially among minorities.

“Instead, we must learn to ask ourselves what racism looks like, especially to those who are at the receiving end... Racism feels real, even if we don’t believe so.”

Mr Hazni Aris Hazam Aris, vice-chairman of AMP Singapore, a non-profit group serving the Muslim community, said that there needs to be a “paradigm shift” in how inter-racial relations are approached and understood.

“The types of conversations on race must progress beyond festivals and clothes, and move into understanding values and worldviews that shape how members of a race thinks or behaves.”